EEL5320

Fox

Semester: Spring 2004

Number of students responding: 28

The following numbers are the averages of the student responses
The Lectures were...	1(Disagree) - 5(Agree)	The textbooks...	1(Disagree) - 5(Agree)
informative and useful	4.57	were informative and useful	3.61
easy to understand	3.68	were easy to learn from	3.14
relevant to course material	4.64	were relevant to course material	3.96
important to attend	4.43	contained useful examples	3.61
The professor was...	1(Disagree) - 5(Agree)	The tests and quizzes...	1(Disagree) - 5(Agree)
acessible for help	4.59	were difficult	3.89
fair in grading	4.54	were fair	4.25
easy to understand	4.00	covered enough material	4.29
The homework assigned was...	1(Disagree) - 5(Agree)	The % of the students thought the class was...
excessive (in quantity)	2.21	Too Large 25.93%	Just Right 74.07%	Too Small 0.00%
difficult	2.93	Too fast 40.74%	Just Right 59.26%	Too slow 0.00%
time consuming	3.07	Too hard 18.52%	Just Right 77.78%	Too easy 3.70%
relevant to course material	4.29
representative of test questions	3.96

Relative to other classes, in studying for this class, did you spend more time, same amount of time, or less time

53.57% spent more time.
42.86% spent same amount of time.
3.57% spent less time.

On average the the percentage of total study time that was spent on work related to this class was

41.25%

Would you recommend taking this class with other difficult classes?

46.43% said yes
53.57% said no

If you had to take this class over, would you take the same Professor?

82.14% said yes
17.86% said no

Are you intrested in taking other classes with the same Professor?

85.71% said yes
14.29% said no

Does the class' value outweigh its difficulty? Explain.

65.22% said yes
34.78% said no
It is an important topic, especially if one wants to be an analog designer.
Fundamental class in study of electronics.

Some repersentative comments/advice from students that they would have liked to have prior to taking this course

Simulation projects were difficult only in leaning Cadence. There is a large learning curve with this software, but once you get it, it is easy. Fox makes you feel a little dumb sometimes when you ask him questions, but he is willing to work with you until you understand.

Not enough problems to work for practice. Difficult at times to deduce test material. Annoying that homework is due next lecture.

Professor writes too fast, talks too fast, and erases before you can copy. There are six boards yet he only uses two.

Excellent course. It should be offered every semester by the same professor.